ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu Giai đoạn IV theo phương pháp phân tích gộp×Phân tích Meta Mạng×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcTổng hợp bằng chứng
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1990s–2000s (formalised as regulatory requirement context grew)2002
Người khởi xướngDeveloped through the convergence of meta-analytic methods (Glass, 1976; Hedges & Olkin, 1985) and post-marketing pharmacoepidemiology frameworksLumley (2002)
LoạiEvidence synthesis applied to post-marketing observational and trial dataMethod
Công trình gốcSutton, A. J., Abrams, K. R., Jones, D. R., Sheldon, T. A., & Song, F. (2000). Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471490661Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácPhase IV meta-analysis, post-marketing meta-analysis, pharmacoepidemiologic meta-analysis, post-approval systematic review and meta-analysisMixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis
Liên quan31
Tóm tắtA meta-analytic Phase IV study pools and quantitatively synthesises data from multiple Phase IV (post-marketing) sources — including observational cohorts, registries, spontaneous adverse-event databases, and post-approval randomised trials — to produce a single, more precise estimate of a drug or device's real-world effectiveness, safety, or utilisation pattern. By applying meta-analytic weighting to heterogeneous post-marketing evidence, it bridges the gap between tightly controlled pre-approval trials and the complexity of routine clinical practice.Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Meta-analytic Phase IV Study · Network Meta-Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare