So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thang đo Độ tin cậy truyền thông× | Thang đo hoài nghi cử tri× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Tâm lý học chính trị | Tâm lý học chính trị |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1994 | 1960 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Mark D. West & Spiro Kiousis | Angus Campbell et al. |
| Loại | Self-report | Self-report |
| Công trình gốc≠ | West, M. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71(1), 159-168. DOI ↗ | Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | MTS, Press Credibility Scale, News Media Confidence | PCS, Political Efficacy Cynicism, Electoral System Cynicism |
| Liên quan | 3 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Media Trust Scale measures audience confidence in news media credibility, including perceptions of accuracy, fairness, completeness, and journalists' motivations. Developed by West (1994) and extended by Kiousis (2001), the scale captures both medium-specific trust (trust in TV news vs. newspapers vs. online news) and outlet-specific trust (CNN vs. Fox News vs. BBC vs. local news). Media trust is central to understanding political polarization, misinformation vulnerability, and the functioning of the democratic public sphere, as low-trust populations reject news sources entirely, opening space for alternative information ecosystems. | The Voter Cynicism Scale measures citizen skepticism and disillusionment regarding the political process, including beliefs that the electoral system is rigged, politicians are self-serving, and voting does not matter. The measure captures a pessimistic orientation toward electoral democracy distinct from distrust in institutions (which can coexist with belief in democratic potential) or political alienation. Rooted in Campbell et al.'s American Voter (1960) tradition of measuring political efficacy and cynicism, the scale remains central to understanding voter turnout decline, support for populist alternatives, and democratic legitimacy crises. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|