So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Lấy mẫu Biến thiên Tối đa× | Chọn mẫu trường hợp lệch chuẩn× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Phương pháp luận khảo sát |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) | 1990 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton | Michael Quinn Patton |
| Loại | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 |
| Tên gọi khác | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling | extreme case sampling, outlier sampling, negative case sampling, deviant-case selection |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. | Deviant case sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher intentionally selects cases that are unusual, exceptional, or markedly different from the norm — outliers, extreme successes, or conspicuous failures. The goal is not statistical representation but deep learning from cases that illuminate the boundaries of a phenomenon, challenge prevailing assumptions, or reveal processes that typical cases obscure. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|