ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thử nghiệm lâm sàng Giai đoạn III có đối chứng×Ghép cặp điểm xu hướng×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcThống kê nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiMid-20th century (matching in RCTs formalized ~1950s–1970s)1983
Người khởi xướngFisher, R. A. (matching principles); adapted into confirmatory trial design over mid-20th centuryPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
LoạiControlled confirmatory clinical trial with matchingMethod
Công trình gốcRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácmatched controlled Phase III trial, Phase III matched-pair trial, matched confirmatory trial, matched late-phase RCTPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Liên quan53
Tóm tắtA matched Phase III clinical trial is a confirmatory, late-stage controlled study in which each participant assigned to the experimental treatment is paired with one or more controls who share key prognostic characteristics — such as age, disease stage, or comorbidities — before treatment allocation. By ensuring baseline comparability at the level of matched pairs, the design reduces confounding and improves statistical efficiency in settings where simple randomization alone may produce imbalanced groups or where full randomization is logistically or ethically constrained.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Matched Phase III Clinical Trial · Propensity Score Matching. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare