ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thử nghiệm lâm sàng Giai đoạn II được khớp cặp×Ghép cặp điểm xu hướng×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcThống kê nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1960s–1980s (formalized with Simon optimal designs, 1989)1983
Người khởi xướngGehan (1961) for Phase II designs; matching frameworks adapted from case-control methodologyPaul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
LoạiControlled clinical trial designMethod
Công trình gốcGehan, E. A. (1961). The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 13(4), 346–353. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácmatched Phase II trial, historically matched Phase II study, propensity-matched Phase II trial, externally controlled Phase II trialPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Liên quan53
Tóm tắtA matched Phase II clinical trial is a single-arm or small-controlled early-efficacy study in which treated patients are paired with matched controls — drawn from historical databases, registries, or concurrent external cohorts — on key prognostic variables such as age, disease stage, and performance status. This design allows preliminary efficacy assessment without a concurrent randomized arm, trading randomization for feasibility while partially controlling for confounding through the matching process.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Matched Phase II clinical trial · Propensity Score Matching. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare