ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu sinh thái ghép cặp×Nghiên cứu dịch tễ học cắt ngang×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcDịch tễ học
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1970s–1990s (methodological consolidation)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
Người khởi xướngExtension of classical ecological study design; matching principles formalized in 20th-century epidemiologyClassical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
LoạiObservational study designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
Công trình gốcMorgenstern, H. (1998). Ecologic studies in epidemiology: Concepts, principles, and methods. Annual Review of Public Health, 16, 61–81. link ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
Tên gọi khácmatched ecologic study, geographically matched ecological study, area-matched ecological design, matched aggregate studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtA matched ecological study is an observational epidemiological design in which aggregate units — such as geographic areas, communities, or time periods — are systematically paired or matched on key characteristics before comparing exposure and outcome rates. Matching at the group level controls for area-level confounders and improves comparability between exposed and unexposed units, producing more credible estimates of ecological associations than an unmatched counterpart.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Matched ecological study · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare