ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu dịch tễ học cắt ngang được ghép cặp×Nghiên cứu đoàn hệ được ghép cặp×
Lĩnh vựcDịch tễ họcDịch tễ học
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiMid-to-late 20th century (formalized ~1970s–1990s)Mid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983
Người khởi xướngDeveloped within the tradition of observational epidemiology; matching principles codified by Greenland, Rothman, and Kelsey in modern epidemiology textsEstablished practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
LoạiObservational epidemiological study designObservational analytic study design
Công trình gốcRothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
Tên gọi khácmatched cross-sectional survey, matched prevalence study, matched cross-sectional design, frequency-matched cross-sectional studymatched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study
Liên quan55
Tóm tắtA matched cross-sectional epidemiological study is an observational design that measures exposure and outcome simultaneously in a population sample while applying matching to control for one or more confounding variables. By pairing or grouping participants on key characteristics such as age, sex, or socioeconomic status before or during analysis, the design reduces confounding bias without requiring longitudinal follow-up, making it efficient for estimating prevalence and cross-sectional associations.A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Matched Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study · Matched Cohort Study. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare