ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

MAIHDA×Intersectionality Analysis×
Lĩnh vựcGender StudiesGender Studies
HọRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời20181989
Người khởi xướngClare Evans & S. V. Subramanian (building on Juan Merlo)Kimberlé Crenshaw
LoạiCross-classified random-effects multilevel modelCritical qualitative analytic framework
Công trình gốcEvans, C. R., Williams, D. R., Onnela, J.-P., & Subramanian, S. V. (2018). A multilevel approach to modeling health inequalities at the intersection of multiple social identities. Social Science & Medicine, 203, 64–73. DOI ↗Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácIntersectional MAIHDA, Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy, Intersectional Multilevel AnalysisIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
Liên quan34
Tóm tắtMAIHDA — Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy — is a quantitative method for studying intersectional inequalities. Introduced for intersectionality by Clare Evans and S. V. Subramanian in 2018, building on Juan Merlo's discriminatory-accuracy framework, it treats the many strata formed by crossing social categories (for example gender × race/ethnicity × education) as level-2 units in a multilevel model, then partitions outcome variation between and within those strata to assess how much intersectional position predicts the outcome.Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: MAIHDA · Intersectionality Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-24 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare