So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích nội dung pháp lý× | Phân tích diễn ngôn× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Phương pháp thực địa | Nghiên cứu định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Loại≠ | Systematic qualitative-quantitative text analysis | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | LCA, legal text analysis, jurimetric content analysis, statutory content analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Legal content analysis applies the systematic procedures of content analysis to legal texts — statutes, regulations, judicial opinions, treaties, and legal commentaries — in order to identify patterns, themes, and trends across a corpus of legal material. It bridges qualitative legal scholarship and quantitative social-science methods, enabling researchers to draw reproducible, evidence-based conclusions about how law is written, applied, or has changed over time. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|