So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thang đo Tôn giáo Nội tại-Ngoại tại (Thang đo I/E)× | Bảng kiểm Hệ thống Niềm tin (SBI)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Tâm lý học tôn giáo | Tâm lý học tôn giáo |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1967 | 2011 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Gordon W. Allport & J. Michael Ross | James M. Holland, Jill M. Currier, & Robert A. Neimeyer |
| Loại | Self-report | Self-report |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. DOI ↗ | Holland, J. M., Currier, J. M., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2011). The Systems of Belief Inventory: Factor structure and association with psychosocial outcome in bereavement. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 311–321. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | I/E Scale, Allport-Ross Scale | SBI, SBI-15 |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The I/E Scale, originally developed by Allport and Ross in 1967, is a foundational measure in the psychology of religion that distinguishes between two motivational orientations toward religion: intrinsic (religion as end in itself, source of meaning) versus extrinsic (religion as means to social, personal, or practical ends). This conceptual distinction has profoundly influenced decades of research on religious prejudice, moral behavior, and health outcomes. The original 20-item version has been refined to a 14-item form (I/E-Revised) that improves psychometric properties while maintaining theoretical clarity. | The Systems of Belief Inventory (SBI), developed by Holland, Currier, and Neimeyer in 2011, is a 15-item self-report measure designed to assess the coherence, flexibility, and adaptive function of an individual's worldview and meaning-making system. Originally validated in bereavement research, the SBI captures dimensions of spiritual and existential belief that predict psychological adjustment following loss or trauma. It measures three key aspects: existential meaning-making, negative religious coping, and hope. The scale is useful in grief counseling, trauma recovery, and any clinical context where worldview disruption occurs. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|