ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích tài liệu diễn giải×Phân tích diễn ngôn phê phán diễn giải×
Lĩnh vựcĐịnh tínhĐịnh tính
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời2000s (building on hermeneutic traditions from the 20th century)1990s–2000s
Người khởi xướngGlenn Bowen (systematic method); Lindsay Prior (social use of documents)Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions)
LoạiQualitative document-based research methodQualitative discourse analysis design
Công trình gốcBowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126
Tên gọi khácinterpretive documentary analysis, hermeneutic document analysis, qualitative document analysis, interpretive textual analysisinterpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtInterpretive document analysis is a qualitative method that systematically examines written, visual, or digital documents to construct meaning from them within their social, historical, and institutional contexts. Rather than simply counting content categories, it reads documents as social artefacts — asking not only what a document says, but what it does, who produced it, for what purpose, and what assumptions it encodes. The approach draws on hermeneutic and interpretive traditions to move between individual passages and the broader context in which they were created.Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Interpretive document analysis · Interpretive critical discourse analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare