ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích Bao trùm Ưu tiên Mờ Do dự (DHFPEA / SHFPEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)×Phân tích Bao trùm Mờ Lưỡng lự (DHFEA / SHFEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)×HFGPE×HFPE×
Lĩnh vựcRa quyết địnhRa quyết địnhRa quyết địnhRa quyết định
HọMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Năm ra đời2018201820182018
Người khởi xướngZhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S.Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S.Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S.Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S.
LoạiHFEA extension with ordinal attribute preference constraints — same score/deviation LP as HFEA but with additional weight ordering inequalities p_g ≥ p_t ≥ … ≥ p_m encoding the decision maker's stated preference order over criteria; produces preference-consistent efficiency rankings and improvement schedules.DEA extension to Hesitant Fuzzy Sets — efficiency measured as weighted score-to-deviation ratio m_e = Σp_i·s_{ie} / Σq_i·d_{ie}; LP-solved in linearised DHFEA (deviation-normalised) or SHFEA (score-normalised) form; provides both ranking and improvement schedules for inefficient alternatives.Generalization of HFPE: cross-efficiency E_{el}(d) = d·E^max_{el} + (1-d)·E^min_{el} blends benevolent (d=1) and aggressive (d=0) strategies via parameter d ∈ [0,1]. When d is unknown, the Backward Fitting Method (BFM) estimates the optimal d from historical/preference ranking constraints by solving a quadratic programme. Final ranking by column-mean of the blended cross-efficiency matrix.Cross-efficiency DEA extended to HFS — each alternative is evaluated by both its own optimal HFEA weights (self-evaluation, score E_{ee}) and by the optimal weights of every other alternative (peer evaluation, cross-efficiency E_{el}). Benevolent strategy maximises peer scores; aggressive strategy minimises them. Final ranking by column-mean of cross-efficiency matrix.
Công trình gốcZhou, W., Chen, J., Xu, Z. S., Meng, S. (2018). Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement. Information Sciences DOI ↗Zhou, W., Chen, J., Xu, Z. S., Meng, S. (2018). Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement. Information Sciences DOI ↗Zhou, W., Chen, J., Xu, Z. S., Meng, S. (2018). Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement. Information Sciences DOI ↗Zhou, W., Chen, J., Xu, Z. S., Meng, S. (2018). Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement. Information Sciences DOI ↗
Tên gọi khác
Liên quan3312
Tóm tắtHFPEA (Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Envelopment Analysis (DHFPEA / SHFPEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)) is a dea multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.HFEA (Hesitant Fuzzy Envelopment Analysis (DHFEA / SHFEA, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)) is a dea multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.HFGPE (Hesitant Fuzzy Generalized Peer-Evaluation (strategy-blended cross-efficiency with BFM, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)) is a dea multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.HFPE (Hesitant Fuzzy Peer-Evaluation (benevolent / aggressive cross-efficiency, Zhou-Chen-Xu-Meng 2018)) is a dea multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zhou, W. Chen, J. Xu, Z. S. Meng, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 1 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: HFPEA · HFEA · HFGPE · HFPE. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare