So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Đánh giá rủi ro gian lận× | Mô hình Rủi ro Kiểm toán× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Kế toán | Kế toán |
| Họ | MCDM | MCDM |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2002 | 1983 |
| Người khởi xướng | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) |
| Loại≠ | Fraud risk assessment and audit procedure framework | Professional auditing framework |
| Công trình gốc≠ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2016). Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. AU-C Section 240. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ | American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Audit Risk. AU-C Section 200. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | Fraud Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, Anti-Fraud Assessment | Risk-Based Audit Planning Model |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Fraud Risk Assessment is a structured audit methodology required by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for identifying and evaluating risks that financial statements could be materially misstated due to fraud. Unlike audit risk assessment focused on error, fraud assessment considers intentional deception by management or employees, incorporating fraud theory, the corporate environment, and specific fraud risk factors to design targeted audit procedures. | The Audit Risk Model is a foundational framework developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) that structures audit planning by decomposing overall audit risk into three components: inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk. This model guides auditors in allocating resources and designing audit procedures proportionate to the level of risk in each account or assertion. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|