So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Báo cáo Hình và Bảng: Tiêu chuẩn Trực quan hóa Dữ liệu× | Cấu trúc IMRaD: Giới thiệu, Phương pháp, Kết quả và Thảo luận× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Viết học thuật | Viết học thuật |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1983 | 1970 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Tufte (visual communication theory), ICMJE standards, APA style guide | International scientific publishing community (adopted widely by 1970s) |
| Loại | Guideline | Guideline |
| Công trình gốc≠ | American Psychological Association (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ISBN: 978-1-4338-3216-1 | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | data visualization, table design, figure captions | IMRaD, IMRAD, scientific manuscript structure |
| Liên quan≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Tables and figures are the primary means of presenting research data in scientific manuscripts. A well-designed table or figure enables readers to grasp complex data patterns instantly; a poorly designed one obscures findings or misleads. The ICMJE Recommendations and APA Publication Manual establish standards for table and figure formatting, captions, legends, and referencing. Tables are best used for precise numerical values and comparisons across rows and columns; figures (graphs, plots, images) are better for illustrating trends, relationships, or distributions. Both must be self-contained (understandable without consulting the text) and referenced clearly in the manuscript. | IMRaD is the standard organizational framework for scientific manuscripts in biomedical and natural sciences research. It separates reporting into four sequential sections—Introduction (why the research was conducted), Methods (how it was done), Results (what was found), and Discussion (what the findings mean)—enabling readers to understand, evaluate, and reproduce the work. Adopted as best practice by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) since the 1970s, IMRaD structure is now mandated or strongly recommended by most peer-reviewed journals. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|