ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Tổng quan lập bản đồ lĩnh vực×Bản đồ khoa học×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng khoa họcTrắc lượng thư mục
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời2005 (foundational framework); field-mapping purpose formalised c. 2015–20182000s
Người khởi xướngArksey & O'Malley (scoping review framework); field-mapping purpose formalised by Munn et al. and Peters et al.Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others
LoạiEvidence synthesis — systematic review variantMethod
Công trình gốcMunn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic review and scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. DOI ↗Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácfield-mapping scoping study, evidence-mapping scoping review, field map review, scoping review for field mappingknowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization
Liên quan65
Tóm tắtA field-mapping scoping review is a purposive variant of the scoping review in which the overarching goal is to chart the conceptual and empirical landscape of a research field — identifying what has been studied, by whom, using which methods, and where knowledge gaps remain. It follows the Arksey and O'Malley scoping framework but is explicitly oriented toward producing a structured map of a field rather than answering a focused clinical or policy question.Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Field-mapping Scoping review · Science Mapping. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare