ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Tổng quan lập bản đồ lĩnh vực×Phân tích thư mục×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng khoa họcTrắc lượng khoa học
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời2005 (foundational framework); field-mapping purpose formalised c. 2015–20181969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Người khởi xướngArksey & O'Malley (scoping review framework); field-mapping purpose formalised by Munn et al. and Peters et al.Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
LoạiEvidence synthesis — systematic review variantQuantitative literature analysis
Công trình gốcMunn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic review and scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. DOI ↗Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349. link ↗
Tên gọi khácfield-mapping scoping study, evidence-mapping scoping review, field map review, scoping review for field mappingbibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtA field-mapping scoping review is a purposive variant of the scoping review in which the overarching goal is to chart the conceptual and empirical landscape of a research field — identifying what has been studied, by whom, using which methods, and where knowledge gaps remain. It follows the Arksey and O'Malley scoping framework but is explicitly oriented toward producing a structured map of a field rather than answering a focused clinical or policy question.Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Field-mapping Scoping review · Bibliometric Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare