ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Siêu dân tộc học lập bản đồ lĩnh vực×Tổng hợp siêu cấp định tính×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng khoa họcTổng hợp bằng chứng
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1988 (meta-ethnography); field-mapping application 2000s–2010s2007
Người khởi xướngNoblit & Hare (meta-ethnography base); field-mapping frame developed in review methodology literatureSandelowski & Barroso (2007), Popularized by Thomas & Harden (2008)
LoạiQualitative evidence synthesis with field-mapping scopeFramework
Công trình gốcNoblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930599Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácfield-mapping qualitative synthesis, scoping meta-ethnography, field-mapping qualitative meta-synthesis, landscape meta-ethnographyQualitative Evidence Synthesis, Thematic Synthesis, Metasynthesis, Qualitative Systematic Review
Liên quan62
Tóm tắtField-mapping meta-ethnography combines the breadth of a field-mapping (scoping) review with the interpretive synthesis power of meta-ethnography. It first maps the full landscape of qualitative studies on a topic to understand what has been studied and how, then applies Noblit and Hare's seven-step meta-ethnographic synthesis to generate second-order and third-order constructs that represent the accumulated qualitative evidence across that field.Qualitative meta-synthesis is a systematic method for synthesizing findings from multiple qualitative research studies (interviews, focus groups, ethnographies) to develop integrated interpretations and theoretical insights. Formalized by Sandelowski and Barroso (2007) and popularized by Thomas and Harden (2008), qualitative meta-synthesis preserves the rich, contextual, interpretive nature of qualitative evidence while enabling broader conclusions across multiple studies. Unlike quantitative meta-analysis, which pools numbers, qualitative meta-synthesis synthesizes themes, meanings, and conceptual insights—answering questions like 'How do cancer patients experience treatment side effects?' or 'What factors shape patient engagement with preventive health programs?' across multiple studies.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Field-mapping Meta-ethnography · Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare