So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Nghiên cứu lịch sử đời sống dựa trên thực địa× | Lịch sử bằng lời nói× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1920s (Thomas & Znaniecki); systematised 1980s–1990s | 1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | W.I. Thomas and Florian Znaniecki (early sociological use); Robert Atkinson and Norman Denzin (methodological codification) | Allan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Atkinson, R. (1998). The Life Story Interview. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761904786 | Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957 |
| Tên gọi khác | life history method, biographical field research, life story research, field biography | life history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Field-based life history research is a qualitative design that combines sustained ethnographic fieldwork with in-depth biographical interviewing to reconstruct how individuals have experienced and given meaning to their lives within particular social, cultural, and historical contexts. Unlike archive-only biographical work, the field-based variant requires the researcher to be physically present in the participant's social world over time, gathering both spoken life stories and observational data from that world. | Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|