So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích nội dung dựa trên thực địa× | Phân tích diễn ngôn× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Định tính | Nghiên cứu định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1987 | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | David L. Altheide | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative analytic approach | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65–77. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | field content analysis, naturalistic content analysis, ethnographic content analysis, ECA | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 2 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Field-based content analysis is a qualitative analytic approach that systematically examines documents, artifacts, and texts encountered or produced within a natural field setting. Originally formulated by David Altheide as ethnographic content analysis (ECA), it blends the systematic rigor of traditional content analysis with the reflexive, iterative logic of ethnographic inquiry, allowing the researcher to interact continuously with the data and revise analytic categories as new meaning emerges from the field. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|