ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Feminist Standpoint Analysis×Intersectionality Analysis×
Lĩnh vựcGender StudiesGender Studies
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19831989
Người khởi xướngNancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, Sandra HardingKimberlé Crenshaw
LoạiCritical feminist epistemology and analytic frameworkCritical qualitative analytic framework
Công trình gốcHarding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. ISBN: 9780801497469Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácStandpoint Theory, Feminist Standpoint Epistemology, Standpoint MethodologyIntersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative Analysis
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtFeminist standpoint analysis is a critical epistemology and analytic strategy holding that all knowledge is socially situated, and that beginning inquiry from the everyday lives of marginalized people — historically women — yields a more complete and less distorted account of social reality than the supposedly neutral view from dominant positions. Developed by Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, and Sandra Harding in the 1980s, it argues that the marginalized see both the dominant order and its underside, and that this doubled vision, when methodically developed into an achieved standpoint, can ground a 'strong objectivity' superior to claims of value-free detachment.Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Feminist Standpoint Analysis · Intersectionality Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-24 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare