ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nhật ký Nghiên cứu Trực diện×Phương pháp nhật ký trực diện×
Lĩnh vựcPhương pháp luận khảo sátPhương pháp luận khảo sát
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1981–1989 (systematic articulation in qualitative fieldwork literature)1980s–1990s (formalized face-to-face protocol era)
Người khởi xướngRobert G. Burgess (systematic research diary in fieldwork); Mary Louise Holly (professional journal writing)Rooted in sociological and psychological diary research traditions; face-to-face protocols formalized in the late 20th century
LoạiQualitative data collection and reflexivity toolQualitative / mixed-methods data collection technique
Công trình gốcHolly, M. L. (1989). Writing to Grow: Keeping a Personal-Professional Journal. Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0435084592Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761941484
Tên gọi khácin-person research journal, fieldwork reflexive diary, face-to-face researcher journal, in-person reflexive login-person diary study, face-to-face diary study, personal diary method, paper diary method
Liên quan65
Tóm tắtA face-to-face research diary is a systematic reflexive log maintained by the researcher during in-person fieldwork. Unlike participant diaries, this is the researcher's own running record of observations, analytic thoughts, methodological decisions, and emotional responses captured during or immediately after direct, embodied encounters with participants or field settings. It serves simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument within qualitative research.The face-to-face diary method is a data collection technique in which participants are recruited, briefed, and supported through in-person researcher contact while keeping structured or open-ended diaries over a defined period. By combining the temporal depth of diary records with the rapport and clarity of direct researcher interaction, it reduces ambiguity in diary instructions, improves compliance, and allows the researcher to probe or clarify entries at handover or follow-up meetings.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Face-to-face Research Diary · Face-to-face Diary Method. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare