ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Suy luận tổng hợp phương pháp hỗn hợp định hướng đánh giá×Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp biến đổi×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế nghiên cứuThiết kế nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời2000s–2010s2003–2009
Người khởi xướngAbbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie (meta-inference); evaluation-oriented framing associated with Donna M. Mertens and Jennifer C. GreeneDonna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
LoạiMixed methods research design variantMixed methods research design
Công trình gốcTashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972666Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Tên gọi khácevaluation MMR meta-inference, evaluation-focused meta-inference, mixed methods evaluation inference, meta-inference in evaluation researchtransformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
Liên quan56
Tóm tắtEvaluation-oriented mixed methods meta-inference is a rigorous concluding process in program evaluation research in which the researcher integrates inferences drawn from both quantitative and qualitative strands of a mixed methods study into a single, coherent, higher-order conclusion. This meta-inference is explicitly anchored to evaluation questions — such as program worth, merit, or impact — and is judged by dual quality criteria: inferential consistency and interpretive consistency across strands.Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Evaluation-oriented mixed methods meta-inference · Transformative Mixed Methods Design. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-15 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare