So sánh phương pháp

	Phân tích nội dung pháp lý tập trung vào đánh giá	Đánh giá Chương trình
Lĩnh vực	Phương pháp thực địa	Phương pháp thực địa
Họ	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Năm ra đời	Late 20th century; evaluation-focused applications emerged prominently from the 1990s onward	1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
Người khởi xướng	Builds on Klaus Krippendorff's content analysis framework and legal scholarship traditions	Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
Loại	Systematic qualitative/quantitative legal document analysis	Applied evaluation methodology
Công trình gốc	Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454	Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Tên gọi khác	legal text evaluation, evaluative legal content analysis, assessment-oriented legal content analysis, legal document evaluation research	evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Liên quan	5	3
Tóm tắt	Evaluation-focused legal content analysis is a systematic method for examining legal texts — statutes, regulations, court decisions, contracts, or policy documents — with an explicit evaluative purpose: to assess whether and how well legal instruments achieve specified goals, standards, or values. It combines the structured coding procedures of content analysis with normative legal evaluation criteria, enabling researchers and practitioners to make evidence-based assessments of legal effectiveness, compliance, or quality.	Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.