So sánh phương pháp

	Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp tập trung vào trường hợp với trọng số ngang bằng	Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp ưu tiên định tính
Lĩnh vực	Thiết kế nghiên cứu	Thiết kế nghiên cứu
Họ	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Năm ra đời	2000s–2010s (mixed methods typology formalized ~2007–2011)	1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies)
Người khởi xướng	Creswell & Plano Clark; Yin (case study tradition)	Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Loại	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Công trình gốc	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Tên gọi khác	QUAN+QUAL case study, equal-priority case mixed methods, balanced case-focused mixed methods, equal-status case study mixed methods	QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods
Liên quan	5	6
Tóm tắt	Equal-weight case-focused mixed methods is a research design that investigates a bounded case — a person, program, organization, or event — using qualitative and quantitative strands that are treated as equally important. Neither strand is subordinate; both contribute with the same priority to the final interpretation of the case. Data are collected and analyzed separately, then integrated at the interpretation stage to produce a richer, more complete understanding of the case than either approach could yield alone.	Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story.