So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Endorsement Experiment× | Audit Experiment× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Political Science | Political Science |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời | 2011 | 2011 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Bullock, Imai & Shapiro (statistical framework) | Butler & Broockman (political responsiveness audits); Bertrand & Mullainathan (correspondence-audit lineage) |
| Loại≠ | Indirect survey experiment for sensitive latent support | Randomized field experiment using matched fictitious requests |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Bullock, W., Imai, K., & Shapiro, J. N. (2011). Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan. Political Analysis, 19(4), 363–384. DOI ↗ | Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | Endorsement question design, Endorsement experiment design, Indirect support measurement, Group-endorsement experiment | Correspondence study, Field audit study, Discrimination audit, Responsiveness audit |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | An endorsement experiment indirectly measures latent support for a sensitive or stigmatized actor by randomizing whether a policy is attributed to that actor and comparing how respondents' support for the policy shifts. Formalized statistically by Bullock, Imai, and Shapiro in 2011 to measure support for militant groups in Pakistan, the design infers favorability toward an actor that respondents would not safely disclose directly from the change in policy support it induces, typically estimated with hierarchical item-response models. | An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|