ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Endorsement Experiment×Audit Experiment×
Lĩnh vựcPolitical SciencePolitical Science
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời20112011
Người khởi xướngBullock, Imai & Shapiro (statistical framework)Butler & Broockman (political responsiveness audits); Bertrand & Mullainathan (correspondence-audit lineage)
LoạiIndirect survey experiment for sensitive latent supportRandomized field experiment using matched fictitious requests
Công trình gốcBullock, W., Imai, K., & Shapiro, J. N. (2011). Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan. Political Analysis, 19(4), 363–384. DOI ↗Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácEndorsement question design, Endorsement experiment design, Indirect support measurement, Group-endorsement experimentCorrespondence study, Field audit study, Discrimination audit, Responsiveness audit
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtAn endorsement experiment indirectly measures latent support for a sensitive or stigmatized actor by randomizing whether a policy is attributed to that actor and comparing how respondents' support for the policy shifts. Formalized statistically by Bullock, Imai, and Shapiro in 2011 to measure support for militant groups in Pakistan, the design infers favorability toward an actor that respondents would not safely disclose directly from the change in policy support it induces, typically estimated with hierarchical item-response models.An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 1 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Endorsement Experiment · Audit Experiment. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-24 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare