So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thiết kế Solomon bốn nhóm mù đôi× | Thiết kế Thí nghiệm Nhóm Đối chứng× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thiết kế thí nghiệm | Thiết kế thí nghiệm |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1949 (Solomon design); double-blind blinding integrated in 20th-century experimental practice | 1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Richard L. Solomon (base design); double-blind protocol is a general methodological standard | Ronald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley |
| Loại≠ | True experimental design | Experimental research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | double-blind S4GD, blinded Solomon design, double-blind four-group design, Solomon four-group with double-blind | controlled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The double-blind Solomon four-group design combines Richard Solomon's classic four-group structure — which isolates pretest sensitization effects — with double-blind blinding, ensuring that neither participants nor outcome assessors know group assignments. This combination yields high internal validity by controlling simultaneously for testing effects, expectancy bias, and experimenter influence, making it one of the most rigorous true experimental designs available. | Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|