So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thu thập tài liệu× | Phân tích diễn ngôn× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Phương pháp luận khảo sát | Nghiên cứu định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 3 | 2 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|