So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Chia sẻ dữ liệu và khoa học mở× | Gian lận học thuật trong Nghiên cứu Khoa học× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Đạo đức xuất bản | Đạo đức xuất bản |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2010 | 1989 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Open science movement; Center for Open Science; funding agencies (NIH, EU, NSF) | U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and institutional policies |
| Loại≠ | Framework | Standard |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Open Science Framework (2023). OSF. Center for Open Science. link ↗ | U.S. Office of Research Integrity (2023). Definition of Research Misconduct. Federal Policy on Research Misconduct (42 CFR Part 93). ORI. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | Open Data, Research Data Sharing, Research Reproducibility | Text Plagiarism, Idea Plagiarism, Self-Plagiarism |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Data sharing and open science are practices that maximize research transparency and reproducibility by making raw data, analysis code, and methods publicly available alongside publications. The replication crisis (widespread failure to reproduce published findings in psychology, medicine, and other fields) revealed that traditional publication—focusing on novel results—incentivizes selective reporting and p-hacking. Open science practices (preregistration, data sharing, code sharing, open materials) aim to reduce bias and enable independent verification. Major funders (NIH, NSF, EU) now mandate open science practices, and many journals require data availability statements or code repositories. | Plagiarism—the use of others' words, ideas, or methods without attribution—is formally classified as research misconduct by the U.S. Office of Research Integrity and most institutions worldwide. It ranges from verbatim copying of text to paraphrasing without citation to presenting others' ideas as one's own. Unlike accidental omission of a citation (which is corrected via erratum), plagiarism implies intent or gross negligence and triggers investigation, potential retraction, and career consequences. Plagiarism detection tools (e.g., Turnitin, iThenticate) and manual checking by journals now routinely screen manuscripts. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|