So sánh phương pháp

	Phân tích diễn giải phê phán	Phân tích diễn giải
Lĩnh vực	Phương pháp thực địa	Phương pháp thực địa
Họ	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Năm ra đời	1970s (Habermas); extended through 1980s–1990s	19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969)
Người khởi xướng	Jürgen Habermas (critical hermeneutics); Paul Ricoeur (hermeneutics of suspicion)	Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur
Loại	Qualitative interpretive research approach	Qualitative interpretive method
Công trình gốc	Habermas, J. (1970). On Systematically Distorted Communication. Inquiry, 13(1–4), 205–218.	Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185
Tên gọi khác	critical hermeneutics, critical-interpretive analysis, emancipatory hermeneutics, CHA	hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics
Liên quan	5	6
Tóm tắt	Critical hermeneutic analysis combines interpretive hermeneutics with critical social theory to read texts and discourse not only for meaning but for embedded power relations, ideological distortions, and structures of domination. Originating in Habermas's critique of Gadamer and developed further by Ricoeur's hermeneutics of suspicion, the method asks both 'what does this text mean?' and 'whose interests does this meaning serve?'. It is widely used in education, social work, policy research, and health humanities.	Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation.