ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Lý thuyết nền tảng kiến tạo phê phán×Phân tích chủ đề phê phán×
Lĩnh vựcĐịnh tínhĐịnh tính
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời2000s–2010s (post-Charmaz 2006)2000s–2010s (consolidation as named variant)
Người khởi xướngKathy Charmaz (constructivist GT base); synthesis with critical theory by various scholars (e.g., Belfrage, Hauf; Street; Wuest)Draws on Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis, 2006) combined with critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and postcolonial theorists)
LoạiQualitative research designQualitative analysis approach
Công trình gốcCharmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029164Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácCritical CGT, Critical constructivist GT, Emancipatory constructivist grounded theory, Critical Charmaz grounded theoryCTA, critical-theoretic thematic analysis, thematic analysis with critical lens, critical qualitative thematic inquiry
Liên quan55
Tóm tắtCritical constructivist grounded theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory with an explicit critical theoretical lens — typically feminist, critical race, or Freireian frameworks — to generate theory that not only explains a social process but also interrogates power relations, structural inequalities, and ideological forces that shape participants' experiences. The result is grounded theory with an emancipatory intent.Critical thematic analysis (CTA) is a qualitative approach that combines the systematic coding procedures of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis with the interrogative stance of critical theory. Rather than merely describing patterns in data, CTA asks whose interests those patterns serve, what power relations they reflect, and what is absent or silenced. It is used to surface ideology, structural inequality, and hegemonic assumptions embedded in participants' accounts or in texts.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Critical constructivist grounded theory · Critical Thematic Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare