ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Étude de cas critique×Lý thuyết Nền tảng×
Lĩnh vựcĐịnh tínhNghiên cứu định tính
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1980s–2006 (formalized)1967
Người khởi xướngBent Flyvbjerg (formalized); Robert K. Yin (case study typology)Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
LoạiQualitative research designMethod
Công trình gốcFlyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. DOI ↗Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
Tên gọi kháccritical case, strategic case study, critical-instance case study, paradigmatic case studyGT, Grounded Theory Approach
Liên quan63
Tóm tắtA critical case study is a case study design in which the researcher deliberately selects a case that is strategically important for testing, confirming, challenging, or extending an existing proposition, theory, or policy claim. Rather than choosing a typical or representative case, the researcher argues that if the finding holds here — in this most-likely, least-likely, or paradigmatic instance — it can reasonably be expected to hold more broadly. This purposive logic transforms a single case into a powerful analytical tool.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Critical case study · Grounded Theory. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare