ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phân tích án lệ phê phán×Phân tích diễn giải×
Lĩnh vựcPhương pháp thực địaPhương pháp thực địa
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiLate 1970s–1980s (CLS conference 1977; Unger 1983)19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969)
Người khởi xướngCritical Legal Studies (CLS) movement; key figures include Duncan Kennedy, Roberto Unger, Mark TushnetFriedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur
LoạiQualitative legal research approachQualitative interpretive method
Công trình gốcUnger, R. M. (1983). The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Harvard Law Review, 96(3), 561–675. link ↗Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185
Tên gọi kháccritical legal analysis, CLS case analysis, critical judicial analysis, critical legal readinghermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtCritical case law analysis applies the theoretical tools of Critical Legal Studies (CLS) to the examination of judicial decisions. Rather than accepting legal reasoning at face value, this approach interrogates how courts construct legal arguments, whose interests those arguments serve, and how ideological commitments are concealed beneath the appearance of neutral doctrinal logic. It exposes the political and social dimensions embedded in judicial language and outcomes.Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Critical Case Law Analysis · Hermeneutic Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare