So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Tính hợp lệ của cấu trúc× | Tính hợp lệ theo quy luật (Nomological Validity)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời | 1955 | 1955 |
| Người khởi xướng | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| Loại≠ | Validity evaluation framework | Validity evidence framework |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation | nomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. | Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|