ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Tính hợp lệ phân biệt trong Kiểm tra Thích ứng Máy tính (CAT)×Tính hợp lệ về cấu trúc trong Kiểm tra Thích ứng Máy tính (CAT)×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng tâm lýTrắc lượng tâm lý
HọLatent structureLatent structure
Năm ra đời1959 (discriminant validity); CAT application from 1990s onward1989–2000s
Người khởi xướngCampbell & Fiske (discriminant validity framework); applied to CAT by educational measurement researchersSamuel Messick (unified validity framework); CAT application formalized by Wainer, van der Linden, and colleagues
LoạiValidity evaluation techniqueValidity evaluation / psychometric evidence gathering
Công trình gốcWeiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(2), 70–84. DOI ↗Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan. link ↗
Tên gọi khácCAT discriminant validity, adaptive test divergent validity, CAT scale differentiation, CAT construct separationCAT construct validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, construct validity evidence in CAT
Liên quan56
Tóm tắtDiscriminant validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is the evaluation process confirming that a CAT-administered scale measures its intended construct distinctly from related but conceptually different constructs. Despite the adaptive item-selection mechanism varying each respondent's item set, evidence must be provided that CAT-derived scores do not overlap excessively with scores from theoretically distinct scales.Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Computerized adaptive test discriminant validity · Computerized adaptive test construct validity. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-15 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare