So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Mạng dân tộc học so sánh× | Dân tộc học so sánh× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | Late 1990s–2000s (netnography ~1997; comparative extension ~2000s–2010s) | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Robert V. Kozinets (netnography); comparative extension through multi-site online fieldwork practice | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| Loại | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage. ISBN: 978-1847875532 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | cross-community netnography, multi-site netnography, comparative online ethnography, comparative virtual ethnography | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Comparative netnography applies netnographic methods systematically across two or more online communities, platforms, or cultural contexts to reveal both shared and divergent patterns in online social life. Grounded in Kozinets's netnographic tradition, it extends single-site online ethnography into a comparative logic: the researcher immerses in multiple digital field sites, gathers culturally embedded data, and analyses across sites to generate theoretically richer, transferable insights. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|