So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Nghiên cứu tường thuật so sánh× | Phân tích chủ đề so sánh× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1990s–2000s | 2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative analytical strategy |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis | cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. | Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|