So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Nghiên cứu tường thuật so sánh× | Hiện tượng học so sánh× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1990s–2000s | Late 20th century (comparative applications prominent from the 1980s–1990s onward) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition | Edmund Husserl (foundational); systematised in comparative application by Amedeo Giorgi, Max van Manen, and others |
| Loại | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 | van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645 |
| Tên gọi khác | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis | cross-group phenomenology, multi-group phenomenological study, comparative phenomenological inquiry, contrastive phenomenology |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. | Comparative phenomenology applies phenomenological inquiry to two or more distinct groups, cultures, or contexts, explicitly contrasting how each group lives through and makes meaning of a shared phenomenon. Rather than describing a single unified essence, it reveals both common structures and meaningful differences in lived experience across comparison units. The approach is grounded in Husserlian and hermeneutic phenomenology but extends the standard single-group design into a structured cross-group analysis. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|