So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thiết kế nghiên cứu trường hợp so sánh bội× | Nghiên cứu tường thuật so sánh× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1984 (Yin); 2006 (Stake multiple-case analysis) | 1990s–2000s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition |
| Loại | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 |
| Tên gọi khác | multi-site case study, cross-case analysis, comparative case research, multi-case comparative design | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Comparative multiple case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify patterns, contrasts, and transferable findings. Rooted in Robert Yin's case study methodology and Robert Stake's multiple-case analysis framework, it combines the rich contextual insight of single-case work with the analytical leverage gained by examining how phenomena unfold similarly or differently across distinct settings. | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|