ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu kiểm định mô hình so sánh×Nghiên cứu kiểm định giả thuyết×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế nghiên cứuThiết kế nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1969–2000sEarly 20th century (Fisher 1925; Neyman–Pearson 1933)
Người khởi xướngRooted in structural equation modeling traditions; formalized through Jöreskog (1969) and extended by Vandenberg & Lance (2000)Karl Pearson, Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, Egon Pearson
LoạiQuantitative confirmatory-comparative research designQuantitative confirmatory research design
Công trình gốcKline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417603
Tên gọi kháccomparative model comparison, cross-group model testing, competing model comparison research, comparative structural model evaluationhypothetico-deductive research, confirmatory quantitative research, null hypothesis significance testing, NHST design
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtComparative model testing research is a quantitative design in which two or more theoretically motivated models — or the same model evaluated across distinct groups or conditions — are systematically tested and compared using fit indices, likelihood-ratio tests, or information criteria. The goal is to determine which model better represents the data structure, or whether a model's parameter structure holds equally across comparison groups.Hypothesis testing research is a quantitative design in which the investigator derives one or more explicit, falsifiable propositions from theory, translates them into a null hypothesis (H0) and an alternative hypothesis (H1), collects empirical data, and then applies an inferential statistical test to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to reject H0. The approach is the dominant paradigm for confirmatory science across the social, behavioral, health, and natural sciences.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Comparative Model Testing Research · Hypothesis Testing Research. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare