ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu Lịch sử Lưu trữ So sánh×Phương pháp Lịch sử Truyền miệng×
Lĩnh vựcPhương pháp thực địaPhương pháp thực địa
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đờiLate 19th century (archival foundations); mid-20th century (comparative systematic application)1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s
Người khởi xướngLeopold von Ranke (archival history); Theda Skocpol, Barrington Moore (comparative-historical synthesis)Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie
LoạiQualitative comparative research designQualitative historical-empirical method
Công trình gốcSkocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521294997Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960
Tên gọi kháccomparative-historical analysis, cross-national archival research, comparative archival history, CHARoral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtComparative historical archival research combines systematic examination of primary archival sources across two or more historical cases — nations, regions, institutions, or time periods — to identify causal patterns, structural similarities, and divergences that single-case histories cannot reveal. It is the method of choice when researchers want to explain why similar or different outcomes emerged across distinct historical contexts using documentary evidence.The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Comparative Historical Archival Research · Oral History Method. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-20 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare