ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Lý thuyết nền tảng so sánh×Phân tích chủ đề so sánh×
Lĩnh vựcĐịnh tínhĐịnh tính
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward2000s–2010s (as an explicit comparative variant of thematic analysis)
Người khởi xướngBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholarsVirginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis foundation); comparative extension developed in applied policy and cross-cultural qualitative research traditions
LoạiQualitative comparative research designQualitative comparative analytical strategy
Công trình gốcGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Tên gọi kháccross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysiscross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, multi-group thematic analysis, comparative qualitative thematic analysis
Liên quan66
Tóm tắtComparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies.Comparative Thematic Analysis applies the structured procedures of thematic analysis across two or more distinct groups, sites, or time points, with the explicit aim of identifying both shared patterns and meaningful differences. Rather than producing a single composite account of experience, it yields a layered analysis that maps where themes converge and diverge across comparison units — making it especially valuable for policy-relevant, cross-cultural, or multi-site qualitative studies.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Comparative grounded theory · Comparative Thematic Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare