So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Lý thuyết nền tảng so sánh× | Nghiên cứu tường thuật so sánh× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 1990s–2000s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | D. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly (narrative inquiry); comparative extension by the broader qualitative comparative tradition |
| Loại | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943523 |
| Tên gọi khác | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | comparative narrative inquiry, cross-case narrative research, narrative comparison, comparative narrative analysis |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Comparative narrative research is a qualitative design that collects personal stories or life accounts from two or more participants, groups, or contexts and systematically compares them to reveal patterns, contrasts, and contextual influences. Drawing on narrative inquiry's attention to experience-as-story, it adds a deliberate comparative logic to identify what is shared, what diverges, and why differences emerge across cases. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|