So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Dân tộc học so sánh× | Lý thuyết Nền tảng× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Định tính | Nghiên cứu định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) | 1967 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|