So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích hội thoại so sánh× | Phân tích diễn ngôn so sánh× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s | 1980s–1990s (established as comparative practice through the 1990s) |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onward | Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative micro-analytic research design | Qualitative comparative research approach |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman. ISBN: 978-0582219526 |
| Tên gọi khác | comparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interaction | CDA comparative, cross-context discourse analysis, comparative text analysis, multi-site discourse analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction. | Comparative discourse analysis examines how language constructs meaning, identity, and power by systematically contrasting texts or speech acts drawn from at least two distinct contexts, groups, time periods, or institutions. By holding analytical categories constant across cases, it reveals how discursive patterns diverge or converge, producing insights that single-context discourse analysis cannot generate. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|