ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Nghiên cứu xác nhận so sánh×Nghiên cứu kiểm định mô hình×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế nghiên cứuThiết kế nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời1971 (Jöreskog); systematized in organizational research by 20001970s (Joreskog 1969–1973); widely adopted in social sciences by the 1980s–1990s
Người khởi xướngKarl Jöreskog (multigroup CFA foundation); Robert Vandenberg & Charles Lance (organizational application)Karl G. Joreskog (SEM/LISREL framework); formalized through structural equation modeling tradition
LoạiQuantitative comparative research designConfirmatory quantitative research design
Công trình gốcVandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1462523344
Tên gọi khácmultigroup confirmatory research, cross-group confirmatory study, comparative hypothesis testing design, comparative model testing researchmodel-based research, structural model testing, theory-testing research, MTR
Liên quan45
Tóm tắtComparative confirmatory research tests whether a pre-specified theoretical model or set of hypotheses holds equivalently across two or more distinct groups, time points, or contexts. It extends standard confirmatory analysis by explicitly imposing and evaluating equality constraints across groups, determining not only whether a model fits the data but whether its structure, factor loadings, and parameter estimates are comparable across populations. This design is foundational to cross-cultural, multi-site, and subgroup comparison studies.Model testing research is a confirmatory quantitative design in which the researcher specifies a theoretical model — depicting hypothesized relationships among constructs — and then tests how well that model fits empirical data. Drawing primarily on structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), it evaluates whether the data-implied covariance structure is consistent with the theoretically derived one, yielding fit indices that indicate model-data correspondence.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Comparative Confirmatory Research · Model Testing Research. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-18 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare