So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Lý thuyết nền tảng cổ điển so sánh× | Lý thuyết nền tảng có đối sánh theo trường phái Strauss× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Định tính | Định tính |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1967 (classic GT); comparative application formalised 1970s–1990s | 1967 (discovery); systematic Straussian procedures codified 1990/1998 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Barney G. Glaser & Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); comparative design extended by Glaser | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); comparative extension built on Glaser & Strauss (1967) |
| Loại≠ | Qualitative theory-building design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408 |
| Tên gọi khác | Glaserian comparative grounded theory, classic GT comparative design, comparative CGT, multi-site classic grounded theory | Strauss-Corbin comparative GT, comparative systematic grounded theory, multi-site Straussian GT, comparative grounded theory (Straussian) |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Comparative classic grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies Glaser and Strauss's original Glaserian grounded theory procedures across two or more deliberately selected comparison groups, settings, or time points. The constant comparative method — the analytical engine of classic GT — is extended systematically across sites so that the emerging substantive theory accounts for variation in the phenomenon across different contexts, populations, or conditions. | Comparative Straussian Grounded Theory applies the systematic open–axial–selective coding framework of Strauss and Corbin across two or more purposively selected contexts, groups, or sites to generate theory that explains both within-context processes and cross-context variation. The constant comparative method — the analytic engine first described by Glaser and Strauss (1967) — is elevated to a deliberate design-level strategy, allowing researchers to build mid-range theory that accounts for how social processes unfold differently under varying conditions. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|