So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thang đo Ra quyết định chung CollaboRATE× | Thang đo Sở thích Kiểm soát (Control Preferences Scale - CPS)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Chăm sóc lấy bệnh nhân làm trung tâm | Chăm sóc lấy bệnh nhân làm trung tâm |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2013 | 1997 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Glyn Elwyn | Lois Degner |
| Loại | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Elwyn, G., Barr, P. J., Grande, S. W., Thompson, R., Walsh, T., & Ozanne, E. M. (2013). Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 102-107. DOI ↗ | Degner, L. F., Sloan, J. A., & Venkatesh, P. (1997). The Control Preferences Scale. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 29(3), 21-43. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | Collaborative Therapeutic Engagement Scale | Desired Role in Decision Making, Decision Role Preference |
| Liên quan | 4 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | CollaboRATE is a three-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess shared decision making (SDM) quality in clinical consultations. Developed by Glyn Elwyn and colleagues in 2013, it measures the degree to which clinicians involve patients in decisions about their care through simple, actionable items that are easy to administer and interpret. The scale has become a standard benchmark for evaluating SDM implementation in healthcare systems. | The Control Preferences Scale (CPS) is a five-item measure that assesses a patient's preferred role in healthcare decision making, ranging from a passive (physician-directed) to active (patient-directed) or shared approach. Developed by Lois Degner and colleagues in 1997, the CPS measures the degree of control patients wish to exercise in treatment decisions: whether they prefer to leave decisions to the clinician, collaborate with the clinician, or make the final decision themselves. The scale is widely used to understand patient preferences for decision-making involvement and to evaluate the alignment between preferred and actual roles. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|