So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích đồng trích dẫn (Co-Citation Analysis)× | Bản đồ khoa học× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng thư mục | Trắc lượng thư mục |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1973 | 2000s |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Henry Small | Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others |
| Loại | Method | Method |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. DOI ↗ | Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | co-citation mapping, historiograph, direct citation, citation pair analysis | knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization |
| Liên quan | 5 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Co-citation analysis is a method that identifies the intellectual structure of a research domain by examining how frequently pairs of documents are cited together in other publications. When two papers are frequently cited together in the literature, they are considered co-cited, indicating they are conceptually related or influential within the same research community. Developed by Henry Small in 1973, co-citation analysis maps the 'invisible colleges' of science—networks of researchers working on related problems—and reveals how knowledge domains evolve over time. | Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|