So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Thiết kế Solomon bốn nhóm phân cụm ngẫu nhiên× | Thiết kế Solomon bốn nhóm có khối× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Thiết kế thí nghiệm | Thiết kế thí nghiệm |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1949 (Solomon design); cluster extension formalized in 1990s | 1949 (base); blocking extension applied in behavioral and social sciences from mid-20th century onward |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Richard L. Solomon (four-group logic, 1949); cluster randomization methods developed by Murray and colleagues in the 1990s | Richard L. Solomon (base design, 1949); blocking integrated from classical experimental design tradition (Fisher, 1935) |
| Loại | Experimental design | Experimental design |
| Công trình gốc | Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150. DOI ↗ | Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137–150. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | CR-S4GD, cluster-randomized four-group design, group-randomized Solomon design, Solomon four-group cluster trial | Blocked S4G, randomized blocked Solomon design, Solomon four-group with blocking |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The cluster randomized Solomon four-group design combines cluster randomization — assigning intact groups such as schools, clinics, or communities to conditions — with the Solomon four-group structure that isolates the effect of pretesting. Four clusters (or sets of clusters) are created: two receive the treatment and two serve as controls, with only one treatment cluster and one control cluster receiving a pretest, while the others go straight to the posttest. This structure simultaneously controls for pretest sensitization and the logistical constraint that individual randomization is infeasible. | The blocked Solomon four-group design combines Solomon's classic four-group structure — which disentangles pretest sensitization effects from treatment effects — with blocking on a known nuisance variable. Participants are first grouped into homogeneous blocks (e.g., by baseline ability, gender, or site), then randomly assigned within each block to one of four conditions: pretested treatment, pretested control, unpretested treatment, and unpretested control. This structure simultaneously controls for maturation, pretest reactivity, and block-level variance, making it one of the strongest quasi-controlled experimental frameworks available. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|