So sánh phương pháp

	Thí nghiệm thực địa phân cụm ngẫu nhiên	Thử nghiệm kiểm soát ngẫu nhiên theo cụm
Lĩnh vực	Thiết kế thí nghiệm	Thiết kế thí nghiệm
Họ	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Năm ra đời	1980s–1990s (formalized methodology)	1978–1980s
Người khởi xướng	David M. Murray (group-randomized trials framework); applied broadly in public health and education research	Cornfield (1978); systematised by Donner and colleagues (1980s)
Loại	Randomized experimental design	Experimental design
Công trình gốc	Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195120424	Donner, A., & Klar, N. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. Arnold. ISBN: 978-0340652978
Tên gọi khác	CRFE, cluster-randomized trial in the field, group-randomized field experiment, community-randomized field experiment	cluster RCT, group-randomized trial, community randomized trial, cluster-randomized experiment
Liên quan	4	4
Tóm tắt	A cluster randomized field experiment (CRFE) assigns intact groups — schools, villages, clinics, workplaces — rather than individuals to treatment or control conditions, and the experiment is conducted in real-world settings rather than a laboratory. Randomization at the group level controls for contamination between conditions while preserving the ecological validity of the natural environment. It is the dominant design for evaluating community-level, school-based, or workplace interventions in public health, education policy, and development economics.	A cluster randomized controlled trial (cluster RCT) is an experimental design in which intact social or organisational groups — such as schools, clinics, villages, or workplaces — are randomly assigned to treatment conditions rather than individual participants. Outcomes are still measured at the individual level, but the unit of randomization is the cluster. This design is essential when an intervention is delivered to whole groups, when there is a risk of contamination between participants in the same setting, or when individual randomization is logistically or ethically impractical.